Men's Divorce Law Firm Logo
Florida House Passes Bill to End Permanent Alimony, Governor Needs to Sign
Florida House Passes Bill to End Permanent Alimony, Governor Needs to Sign

Florida lawmakers approved a bill ending permanent alimony on Thursday, April 18th even while Florida Bar lobbyists have been trying to persuade Governor Rick Scott to veto it. James L. Rosica reports for the Associated Press.

The House passed the bill (SB 718) 85-31, with members of both parties crossing over. For example, Rep. Jared Evan Moskowitz, a Coral Springs Democrat, debated in favor and voted for it; Republican Rep. Seth McKeel of Lakeland voted against it.

The Senate previously approved it 29-11. If made a law, Florida would be the fifth state to abolish permanent alimony.

Scott’s office said he would review the bill, but bill sponsor Ritch Workman, a Melbourne Republican, is confident the governor will sign it.

That’s assuming the Florida Bar, which licenses and regulates the state’s 90,000 lawyers, doesn’t wear him down.

The Bar’s “Family Law section has now spent a couple of hundred thousand dollars on a couple of lobbyists to lobby the governor for a veto,” Workman told reporters. “It’s a desperate move.”

Tallahassee attorney Thomas Duggar, a lead member of The Florida Bar’s Family Law section, declined comment on lobbying efforts.

The proposal sets limits on the amount of alimony and how long one would receive financial support from an ex-spouse, though judges would be able to exercise discretion in some cases, such as when a spouse has a disability.

It would make it harder to get alimony in short-term marriages and would generally prevent alimony payments from lasting longer than one-half of the length of the marriage.

The bill defines a short-term marriage as less than 11 years, in which there’s an assumption that alimony would not be awarded. If alimony is granted, it would not be more than 25 percent of the ex-spouse’s gross income.

For failed marriages between 11 and 20 years, there’s no assumption either way, but alimony would not amount to more than 35 percent of the ex-spouse’s gross income.

And in long-term marriages, those longer 20 years, there would be an assumption in favor of alimony, though not more than 38 percent of an ex-spouse’s gross income.

Moreover, the bill doesn’t automatically end alimony when the paying ex-spouse retires, but that person could ask a judge to reduce the payment or even end it. The judge can consider age at retirement, ability to pay alimony and the financial situation of the person receiving alimony.

Rep. Barbara Watson, a Miami Gardens Democrat, said the measure ultimately discriminates against women who decided to be housewives. They will be unlikely to rejoin the workforce with success, she said.

But Elizabeth Porter, a Lake City Republican, said those women will still be entitled to alimony under the bill.

“We’re just saying that every case shouldn’t be permanent alimony,” she said. “You shouldn’t be paying a lifetime of servitude on a short-term marriage.”

Workman himself is divorced but said that did not motivate his interest in carrying the bill.

“There’s nothing personal,” he said, explaining that a poker buddy pestered him with stories of “families that have been ruined by judges and cost them the ability to heal.”

If you need help with alimony, contact the Men’s Divorce Law Firm today to schedule a consultation. Managing Attorney Jeffrey Feulner aggressively represents the interests of husbands and fathers involved in divorce, alimony and other family law matters.